Congress chief ministers have written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi urging his government to pay a compensation of Rs 4 lakh each to the families of the Covid dead, describing the promised Rs 50,000 as insufficient in the face of unprecedented death and suffering.
The party announced a nationwide agitation to highlight the “insensitivity” of the Centre towards Covid victims.
Following Rahul Gandhi’s declaration on Wednesday that the Congress would hold the Modi government to its responsibility as the National Disaster Management Act (NDMA) mandates that the compensation amount be Rs 4 lakh, the chief ministers of Punjab, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh wrote to the Prime Minister offering to deposit the states’ share of the compensation in the bank accounts of the victims’ families.
Under the NDMA, the Centre pays 75 per cent of the compensation while the state shoulders 25 per cent. If a compensation of Rs 4 lakh is paid, Rs 1 lakh will be the state’s share.
The Congress has written to the chief ministers of its alliance partners in Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Jharkhand. The Congress expects Uddhav Thackeray, M.K. Stalin and Hemant Soren to write to the Prime Minister.
In identical letters, the three Congress chief ministers stressed the need to stand by citizens in times of distress and entreated the Prime Minister to grant a compensation of Rs 4 lakh, saying the Rs 50,000 the Centre has pledged in the Supreme Court was insufficient.
Punjab chief minister Charajit Singh Channi wrote: “The welfare model of our Constitution provides our citizens with the basic right to education, health and other essential services. Along with this, our Constitution empowers every citizen to claim these as their constitutional right from the state.
“The Covid pandemic has heavily affected majority of the population in the country. People have died untimely deaths, businesses have shut down, people have been forced to migrate. Families have lost their earning members and the out-of-pocket treatment expenses incurred in private hospitals during the pandemic have brought them to the streets. Families have lost all their savings and are in huge debts.
“We demand that the Central Government implement its earlier order notified on March 14, 2020, issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, where the Government made a commitment to disburse ex-gratia payment of Rs four lakh per deceased. The Central Government later revised this notification and reduced the ex-gratia payment to Rs 50,000. We feel at such times of distress, it is imperative that special consideration should be made to fulfil the earlier commitment of four lakh by the Government.”
Rajasthan chief minister Ashok Gehlot and Chhattisgarh’s Bhupesh Baghel sent similar letters to Modi. The letters underlined that the Centre continued to collect huge revenues by taxing petroleum products but refused to provide relief to the poor even as corporate entities were being given massive tax relief.
The Congress on Thursday also demanded a Covid Commission to study the gamut of problems caused by the pandemic, apart from ascertaining the correct number of deaths. The party announced that there would be demonstrations throughout the country on November 26, 27 and 28 in support of the demand for a compensation of Rs 4 lakh.
Memorandums will be submitted to the authorities in every district and state capital in support of the demand. The party on Wednesday launched the website www.4lakhdenahoga.com and urged citizens to register with it to seek increased compensation.
Indicating that the issue will figure prominently in the upcoming Assembly elections and Parliament session, Congress spokesperson Gourav Vallabh said: “This is not just a threat. Our track record shows that we blocked the government’s move to kill the Land Acquisition Act, we forced the government to give free vaccines to the people after repeated vacillations by the Prime Minister and finally the farm laws had to be withdrawn.”
He added: “Modi can arrange for compensation by stopping the Central Vista project, by cutting down on publicity blitz, by avoiding giving tax relief to crony capitalists.”
The Congress spokesperson alleged that the deaths during the second Covid wave were caused by the Modi government’s mismanagement.
Vallabh claimed that Modi didn’t understand the problems of the country and wanted to cut down on expenditure meant for the poor while providing assistance to the rich and powerful.
President Joe Biden to visit Minnesota on Tuesday as part of $1 trillion infrastructure package push
ST. PAUL — President Joe Biden on Tuesday, Nov. 30, is set to stump for the recently approved $1.2 trillion infrastructure package during a visit to a Twin Cities suburb.
The president is scheduled to discuss the legislation and its expected $6.8 billion impact on Minnesota during a stop at Dakota County Technical College in Rosemount on Tuesday afternoon. It’s Biden’s most recent stop to tout the plan and his first trip to Minnesota since winning the presidency.
In a news release Monday, the White House said Biden would speak about how the package will create jobs and reduce prices on goods since the vast slate of projects could facilitate a smoother flow of supply chains around the country. The release said Dakota County Technical College “has programs to train the next generation of workers to build, operate, and maintain infrastructure” included in the package.
MORE ON THE INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGE:
The federal boost is set to fund more than $4 billion in improvements to Minnesota highways, $818 million for public transportation investments and $302 million to help repair and replace bridges, according to the White House. The plan will also fund broadband expansion, port and airport improvements, water quality projects and electric car charging stations in the state.
State transportation officials have said the funds could allow Minnesota to move forward with projects earlier than they’d planned. More than 661 bridges and 4,986 miles of highway in Minnesota are considered to be in poor condition by the White House.
Biden in 2020 won Minnesota with a 7-percentage point advantage over then-President Donald Trump. But the president’s approval rating has sunk as a result of Americans’ frustrations about ballooning costs of gas and food, as well as his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
U.S. Rep. Angie Craig, a Democrat who represents the state’s 2nd Congressional District, has announced that she’ll join the president for the event.
Follow Dana Ferguson on Twitter [email protected], call 651-290-0707 or email
Spies in the Ointment: Which Way Will FBI, CIA Swing if Trump Returns?
To the growing anxiety about the possibility of a triumphal Donald Trump return to office, we can add yet another worry line: How would the recalcitrant former president mobilize the intelligence agencies to punish enemies and reward friends?
With pro-Trump Republicans increasingly embracing “” to retake control of Washington, from extreme gerrymandering to new voter suppression laws — and poised to capture Congress in the mid-terms — apprehension is growing among veterans of U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies that bad times may be ahead for them.
The former president won’t be shy this time around about installing sycophants atop key national security organs, starting with the Defense, Justice and Homeland Security departments, along with the CIA, NSA and most critically, the FBI, intelligence veterans queried by SpyTalk agree. The lesson he’s likely learned from his first term is not to vacillate over putting overt authoritarian loyalists into senior billets there — and to ignore the howls from more timorous aides or careerists. With an expected Republican control of the House and Senate starting in 2023, according to current forecasts, the confirmation of Trump nominees would be a cinch, if messy.
So imagine this Rocky Horror Show of characters atop the federal government’s national security machinery:
or , both of whom played major roles in the “Stop the Steal” plot to block Joe Biden’s election, as attorney general
, the disgraced for NYPD commissioner and Rudy Giuliani pal who served as quartermaster for the GoP “war room” to overturn the 2020 election result, as FBI director
, the far-right Devin Nunes acolyte who worked tirelessly to bury investigations into Trump’s ties to Russia, and who Trump tried to make the CIA’s deputy director, as director of National Intelligence.
, the pliant Michael Flynn protégé who held the intel portfolio on the White House NSC and later Pentagon, as CIA director.
Authoritarian-loving former Trump ambassador and acting DNIback as secretary of defense or White House national security adviser.
(Q-Ga.), as director of Homeland Security
as director of the eavesdropping National Security Agency.
Scoff, many will. It’s a long way off. Such appointments are unimaginable. But ignoring Trump’sto overturn Joe Biden’s election victory, including inspiring a mob to attack the Capitol and maybe even murder his own vice president, Mike Pence, is willful amnesia, say critics, including intelligence veterans polled by SpyTalk: The Jan. 6 riot may well turn out to be practice for a real Trump-led insurrection. “The image of the raptors in Jurassic Park testing the fences for weaknesses comes to mind,” American University Assistant Professor Mary Ellen Curtin . “‘They remember,’ the caretaker says.”
Almost anyone who’s closely studied Trump’s post-election behavior and the alarming coarsening of the “stop the steal” movement, with its wave of, are confident he’ll stop at nothing to return to power and enact revenge against his opponents. And if he does, there’s good reason to fear that he and his minions, having labelled Democrats and dissident Republicans as “traitors,” will turn the screws of U.S. national security agencies against them.
Justice for All
The key appointment in a second Trump administration would be attorney general, intelligence veterans agree. It’s the Justice Department that can loosen guidelines for U.S. investigative and intelligence agencies, as it did when it approved the CIA’sof terrorist subjects, NSA’s mass of U.S. emails and the FBI’s after the 9/11 attacks.
Panic is clearly premature — the next presidential election is three years away. But worry is warranted, says a former senior Justice Department official in the George W. Bush administration who asked for anonymity in exchange for commenting freely.
“This is impossible to game out, but if there were really an attempt to use the DOJ for something deeply nefarious, I think the norms and institutions would hold — as they did, ultimately, throughout the Trump term,” he told SpyTalk. “But I don’t think we should be complacent about this.”
Likewise, former CIA senior operations official Douglas London calls a possible Trump return to office “a nightmare scenario” for the intelligence community, “since its credibility and focus were significantly undermined during his tenure and are only now beginning to recover.”
CIA lawyers can advise the president and his attorney general that a proposed policy or operation is unwise or legally dubious, he told SpyTalk, but in the end it’s political appointees in the top rungs of the Justice Department who decide what’s legal.
Take the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation program,” London says. “Unfortunately, lawyers at the Department of Justice sanctioned that. They gave it a thumbs up. So the agency officers who were involved in that … had the legal authority for what they were doing.”
“So the greater risk,” he adds, “is the degree to which a politicized Department of Justice might enable CIA and other agencies to effect legally and ethically questionable policies, since CIA’s lawyers take their lead from DOJ’s.” And in the end, he says, CIA operations officers have to “suck it up or resign.”
Guardrails and Exit Ramps
FBI veterans surveyed by SpyTalk think the “guardrails” of bureaucratic norms and oaths officials take to obey the law and defend the Constitution will hold. But most also weren’t absolutely confident of that — an astounding admission in itself — pointing to such disquieting harbingers as the participation of former and active-duty police and military personnel in the Jan. 6 insurrection.
Unsurprisingly, Trump had a substantial following among white police and federal law enforcement personnel, especially in comparison to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. The FBI’s New York office was a hotbed of anti-Clinton rancor, according to.
“I think the rank-and-file, and maybe even senior management, still support him and would welcome his return,” says Terry Albury, a Black former FBI agent who became so alarmed about the bureau’s aggressivefor turning American Muslims into informants — enabled by Bush administration Attorney General Michael Mukasey — that he about it to the media (and eventually served four years in prison for it).
“Trump spoke to their longing and desire for radical change,” Albury said in an interview. As Obama’s term ran out in 2016, he said, “there was an Obama countdown” among white agents in the Minneapolis field office where he worked. “They hated what he represented. When Trump came in, the gloves were off.”
“It’s a strongly conservative organization,” Albury added. Would they welcome a second Trump administration? “Absolutely,” he says. “I definitely think they would.”
Some would, agrees Peter Lapp, a former high level FBI executive with a deep background in counterintelligence. But the “vast majority” would continue to check their politics at the door.
“Some [Trump] supporters might say, yeah, we need a Bernie [Kerik] character” running the FBI, “we need a Mark Meadows type that will clean up the bureau,” says Lapp. “There are probably some folks within the organization that feel that … The bureau is made up of human beings that have their own views, and in many ways they’re suppressed because of the rules and because of the culture and because of the need to be apolitical as an organization.”
If Trump tried to weaponize the FBI against his real or perceived enemies, Lapp says, “I think the vast majority would think that that would be problematic.
“Regardless of their political backgrounds or views, most agents enjoy the fact that the FBI is an independent law enforcement organization and they strive to be that way in how [they] conduct investigations … So I think that most of the workforce would not be happy if there was an obvious kind of ringer put in there.”
At the same time, senior managers who object to a Trumpification of the bureau would likely stay quiet, for the most fundamental reason, Lapp and other former FBI officials say: the agency’s lucrative retirement package.
“The guard rails of the pension would keep…anti-Trump people in line,” Lapp told SpyTalk. But he maintains that “the vast majority of folks” check their politics at the office door anyway.
Other FBI veterans grant that Trump had a following among the rank and file — and may still have some — but that his “stop the steal” antics have cooled the ardor of many.
“I think you’re seeing a lot of Republicans and former Republicans like me who are really fed up with what he did,” says David C. Gomez, a retired FBI executive with broad experience across the federal government and private industry. “They accepted it to a certain point and — had he just let it go and gone off and lived his life and made money and played golf or whatever — they would have been more accepting of his historical perspective. But the guy wanting to come back is a bridge too far for me.”
Trump’s return “would be a disaster” for the FBI, Gomez, now a security consultant for the London-based group, BSI, told SpyTalk. On the one hand, he sees “a lot of people leaving,” especially those with career records that could land them lucrative jobs on the outside. On the other hand, “people who have more than 10 years in may stick around” for the bureau’s generous pension, the golden fleece for middle management. How they would respond to a Trump appointee’s effort to target Trump’s real or perceived political enemies is “the $64 million question,” Gomez says, “because it’s the rank and file who are the ones that are going to be in the cross hairs of that.”
Some former FBI and CIA officials have long worried about the “militarization” of their agencies over two decades of war and counterterrorism operations, with a concomitant rise of Trump sympathizers in the ranks. At the FBI, Lapp says, many senior managers in recent years earned “badges of distinction” from their service in Iraq or other war zones or came up from the swashbuckling hostage rescue teams.
The FBI has “a history of recruiting folks to come from the military and I think that prevalence has increased over the years,” Lapp said in a SpyTalk interview. “And with that comes the military-type mindset of how to tackle problems,” versus the mentality of “investigators with the skills and passion for the law and the Constitution.” Same for the recent senior managers who came up through hostage-rescue or SWAT teams, he says. Still , he maintains, they’ve all sworn an oath to follow the law.
At the CIA, an influx of counterterror veterans increasingly altered the workforce vibe, moving it away from its collegial, if sometimes raucous, culture of give-and-take to a more military-style “yes, sir — no, sir” regimen, says Douglas London, a 34-year CIA veteran who was Counterterrorism Chief for South and Southwest Asia before his retirement in 2019.
“Post-9/11, the leadership of the agency was filled with folks … who embraced a very conservative religious, political-social view of the world, who had come from positions in the military and were much more willing to embrace a harsher code of engagement with detainees, or even agents,” London said duringabout his new book,
“I think it would be pretty bad if Trump or a Trump-light person came back and executed those same policies and worse in an emboldened White House,” London said in an interview last week. “But you know, if it’s legal, then agency officers will either leave in protest or suck it up and go, ‘Okay, well, that’s a lawful order’ — just like the military.”
“Personally, I’m a bit more worried about the military than the CIA,” London added. “There were more military people at the January 6 insurrection than from across the IC, a frightening number who remain sympathetic to those who stormed the Capital. I never imagined I’d see the day when the chairman of the Joint Chiefs was required to remind service members to ‘obey the lawful orders of civilian control of the military’ and to ‘not become involved with domestic politics.'”
Gen. Mark Milley, the JCS chairman, was so worried about Trump’s mental stability in the weeks before the presidential election that he called his Chinese counterpart to assure him no plans were in the works for a U.S. attack, but if there were, he’d warn him in advance, according to Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Robert Costa in their book,. Milley confirmed he’d made the call, but said it wasn’t his intention to undermine Trump.
It’s become increasingly difficult, meanwhile, to differentiate Trump’s “stop the steal” movement and the Qanon conspiracy cult, which extremism expert Jason Blazakis, pointing to the involvement of onetime DIA chief and Trump national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn and the CIA’s former Bin Laden unit chief,, calls, “ .” Both have countless thousands of followers in the conspiracy world, at least some — perhaps many — working in intelligence and law enforcement.
It’s the political vagaries of the rank and file that concern David Gomez. A history buff, the former FBI agent points to the role of ordinary police in the rise of Hitler and the Nazis.
“It was acquiescence by basic-level police officers that allowed a lot of things to happen that probably wouldn’t have happened [without them], you know? So I just don’t know what the answer is to that” — a Trump weaponization of the FBI. “I can’t gauge anymore how the current rank and file would react to that.
“Sometimes,” he says, “your hands are tied, because you’ve got a family to take care of, and a pension that you don’t want to lose.”
As always, the answer may come in a shopworn dictum: Follow the money.
This article by Jeff Stein first appeared on.
The opinions expressed in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Military.com. If you would like to submit your own commentary, please send your article to [email protected] for consideration.
Show Full Article
© Copyright 2021 SpyTalk. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Himachal Pradesh adds 90 new Covid-19 cases | Shimla News
As per the latest figures, the hill state’s Covid tally has now risen to 2,27,093 of which 824 cases are active, 222422 patients have recovered while 3830 patients have died.
Fresh cases reported during the day included one from Bilaspur, three from Chamba, 14 from Hamirpur, 25 from Kangra, 20 each from Mandi and , two from Solan and five from Una district.
News7 months ago
Download Lucifer (Season 1-5) Hindi Dubbed English Dual Audio All-Episodes 480p [150MB] 720p [350MB]
News7 months ago
Scam 1992 download filmyzilla Hindi
News5 months ago
The Conjuring 3 The Devil Made Me Do It (2021) Dual Audio [Hindi+English] HQ Studio Dubbed Download | 480p [410MB] | 720p [730MB]
News5 months ago
Download Loki (Season 1) (2021) Dual Audio Hindi-English 480p | 720p | 1080p – Moviesflix – TheMoviesFlix.com |Moviesflix | Movies flix
News5 months ago
Download Jinde Meriye (2020) Punjabi Full Movie 480p [400MB] | 720p [1.2GB]
News5 months ago
The Hitman’s Wife’s Bodyguard (2021) English [Subtitles Added] Bluray Download | 480p [350MB] | 720p [850MB]
News6 months ago
Lucifer Season 1-5 (Season 5 Part 2 Added) Dual Audio [Hindi ORG 5.1+English] Web-DL HD | 480p | 720p
News3 months ago
Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021) Dual Audio [Hindi+English] HDCam v2 Download | 480p [300MB] | 720p [1.1GB]